[.uk] Denmark Vesey: The Buried Story of America's Largest ... (ISBN 0679762183)

Within a hair's breadth of changing US history:
The parallels between Denmark Vesey's failed slave insurrection in Charleston in 1822 and the start of Toussaint's successful slave insurrection in Saint Domingue (now Haiti) in 1791 are striking. In both circumstances, black slaves comprised the vast majority of the population -- 75% in Charleston, 90% in Saint Domingue. In both, the hopeful liberators were former slaves who had become literate, fairly well-to-do, free blacks. Both Toussaint and Vesey distrusted mulattoes, who were regarded in both societies as a distinct class, with ambivalent loyalties. Both leaders took advantage of the disparate religious beliefs of their followers to enhance group cohesiveness. In any such mass event, planned well in advance, the risk of discovery or betrayal is always great. Remarkably, in both of these planned insurrections, rumors and confessions alerted authorities weeks in advance of the scheduled dates. And in both, the white slaveholders were incredulous that ignorant, simple blacks could possibly coordinate an uprising of the size suggested by their informants. In both instances, the threat was dismissed as fantasy. As we know, the French authorities of Saint Domingue were too late in recognizing the magnitude and reality of the uprising. Few of us, however, have grasped the slim margin of time by which white Charlestonians were able to prevent a similar success in Charleston. Considering that Charleston was the prime destination of French planters fleeing the conflagration in Saint Domingue, Charlestonians should have been more attuned to the threat brought on by their slaveholding, minority autocracy. But, as Robertson points out, there was a degree of theater involved in living as a dominant white minority among a vast population of black slaves, and part of that theater was the belief by slaveholders that their slaves were grateful for being well treated--that slaves could recognize that it is better to be fed and clothed and sheltered as a slave than to be free as a savage. This delusion led to the Charlestonians' nearly fatal delay in responding to the signs of impending insurrection. STRENGTHS: The story of Denmark Vesey is as fine an example of "Silencing the Past", in Michel-Rolph Trouillot's words, as the story of Saint Domingue. Despite the conscious efforts of Charlestonians to obliterate the history of the event (efforts well chronicled by Robertson) the author has assembled a creditable body of confirmed and "probable" details about Vesey and the planned insurrection. His unflinching thoroughness is revealed in such details as the fact that Peter Prioleau, the slave who initially betrayed the plot, was freed in 1822 by a special act of the legislature, and given a lifetime pension. We learn that by 1840, Prioleau is himself the owner of 7 slaves. The brief text (153 pages) is readable compelling, and well documented. In an appendix, Robertson includes 1 paragraph biographies of the other men who were executed along with Denmark Vesey. These poignant scraps are practically all that is know of many of these would be liberators. Interestingly, we learn that Vesey's attempted insurrection apparently led to the US's refusal to grant diplomatic recognition to the Republic of Haiti until the US Civil War. This veritable boycott of the Western Hemisphere's second oldest republic by its older brother may be seen as a significant cause of Haiti's financial and political instability during the first half of the 19th century. WEAKNESSES: I'm stumped here. Perhaps the only shortcoming I can point out is that the text would be enhanced by a period map of Charleston, to enable the reader to follow some of the geographical commentary. CONCLUSION: This short, fluidly written history of an event which could have resulted in a stunning alteration of American history, is also great reading.

Excellent research and writing:
I was surprised to see that this wonderful biography has not been popular among Amazon.com customers. In telling a moving story of courage and rebellion, Robertson succeeds in bringing the reader to Vesey's time and place. This book should be taught in schools, particularly as it brings to life an important and largley overlooked figure in American history. I cannot recommend it highly enough to readers interested in American history, slavery, the South, and social justice.

This book should not be missed.:
David Robertson's book on the life of Denmark Vesey and the planned insurrection of slaves and freed blacks is a powerful, griping story unknown by most American blacks and whites. American school children are always instructed on the bravery of George Washington, Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, etc. and other courageous Founding Fathers who rebelled against the mighty British Empire. As we know, the colonials fought for freedom, liberty and justice. While Americans are proud of the Founding Fathers, the English government believed our heroes were traitors and worthy of death. The labeling of one as a "hero/patriot" or "rebel/terrorist" is related to ones perspective of the "cause". In a brief 153 pages, Roberston leaves the reader grasping for more information about this free, skilled(carpenter), relatively well-off black male, who at the age of 60 risked his life to free slaves in a plan surely doomed for failure. How could a former slave believe an insurrection of this type would not only go undetected, but also ultimately succeed? Robertson provides the reader with enough historical information about Vesey that one believes the plan would have succeeded if not for a few informers. The fact that Vesey and his trusted compatriots enlisted 9000 slaves prepared to rebel clearly demonstrates his planning and leadership skills. After his betrayal, the manner in which Vesey conducted himself under tortuous conditions is inspiring. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of the American judicial system. Upon reflection, what is evident in this story of Denmark Vesey is not that a slave rebellion ultimately failed and many of its organizers and participants executed. What is clear is that basic human rights, respect and dignity (as so eloquently delineated in the U.S. Constitution) are not only universally desired, but will ultimately be seized by those so denied. History is full of such brave men and women who pursue justice regardless of personal circumstances and comfort. Denmark Vesey was such a man; an American indoctrinated with the concept of freedom and willing to give his life so his fellow man could have it.

Annoyed As Hell!:
I find his work to be primarily "his story", rather than an objective historical account. He was unable to set aside his on prejudices and write a well-balanced account of Denmark Vesey. Is it possible that only a person of African American descent can tell our story truthfully. I generally say yes. But I have read a few non-Africans who have done an excellent job and dare write the truth.. But I believe if you want your story told right, you can't count on outsiders to tell it. However, I did learn some things and I have been directed to some real historians, which some of them are of African descent. So I am in hopes of getting a fuller view of the great Denmark Vesey, who would have led a successful rebellion of Charleston had it not been for a house slave running to massa to tattle. In addition, why is it seen as a crime to the people holding my neck under water, desperately trying to drown me that I wish to cut their throats if given a chance. It is not every human's right to destroy those who wish to destroy them? It is your God given right and command. I guess as long as they are the ones doing the killing, stealing and raping it is all good?! Some irritating comments by the author: Vesey motives were no peaceful." "Among the quasi-Christian slaves of the Sea Islands, he was a savage Chieftain who, as a token of his powers, had chosen Gullah Jack as his war advisor and his familiar. "This duality is central to Vesy's leadership - a free black who felt himself enslaved, a secular enlightenment autocrat who was also a passionate religionist, a liberator of the oppressed and a potential murder of the innocence." What a bunch of horse manure. Dah! I wonder why some folks think it is criminal for the oppressed to want to slaughter those who terrorize them, rob them of their labor, work them to death, rape their wives and daughters, sell their children off like cattle, etc. It is their duty. It is generally garbage, but even in garbage you can find a few gems. And those gems for me were his shoutin out some real historians I am familiar and who I know don't write any rubbish. "At the conclusion of this meeting, he insisted that everyone present contribute twelve and a half cent in order "to pay that black man's wages to his mistress." Author Is this a direct quote and what is the source? Or is the author using quotation marks for emphasis. I can't imagine a black man using the wording. Isn't it obvious that the man is black. Why the need to say "black man." This is why I doubt this is a direct quote made by black man in reference to another black man. "In both the old world and the New, the records of slave revolts are a testimony to the courage of human beings, but they also are evidence of the human unwillingness to accept the laws of probability?" Author This is rubbish. Let me remind the author the only way the white slave owning class knew about the slave revolt is because a house slave ran to his master to report it. Therefore, the probability that the revolt would have happened had it not been for this man is 100%. The author contradicts his own story. Also, may I remind the author of little island called Haiti. Every slave rebellion except that of Nat Turner was spoiled by a slave telling his owner about what was happening. I figure what gets them is that these Africans generally out smarted them and they only had information through another black, not their own intelligence, which the author said several times clearly in his own words. When it was first reported, the tattler's owner did not even believe him. So this is wishful thinking on the part of the author. I do not recommend this book. If you must read it, check it out at the library. Don't waste your money on it.

A Must Read for ALL Amercans:
This is an empowering and inspiring story by a gifted storyteller who surprisingly managed to stay neutral and objective throughout his research into the man and the myth of Denmark Vesey. There are so many lessons for all Americans courageous enough to examine the actions and motives of their immediate ancestors as well as their own often conflicting feelings toward each other.